Or, should we chalk another one up to
the monks?
We've gotten off to a slow start at the
Teilhard Guesthouse. All of our class and work schedules changed at
the beginning of the semester, but it took us until Week 3 to figure
out how to adjust our goals and communal practices around these
changes.
I personally was a bit frustrated by
our slow start. You can reasonably ask why, if I was frustrated, I
didn't just jump in and start the reorganizing. I certainly thought
about it, but I was plagued by tiredness over always being the one
who would wrangle things into shape. I wanted something else to
happen.
This got me to thinking about
leadership in intentional communities. Your average monastic
community will have an Abbot/Abbess, someone designated to wrangle
things into shape. We've avoided the monastic model, we have no
designated leader. All last semester that worked fine. The five of us
could easily make decisions by consensus. It broke down a bit when we
needed to get going again. I didn't want to seize control of our
leaderless group, and I'm guessing folks were likely grateful that I
didn't do my usual wrangling thing, but it did mean we floundered
there for a while. I'm sure I was more perturbed by this than others, being a person who likes to be regular and disciplined about things.
In the end it worked out. We brought
things up over our communal dinner and were able to communally reset
things. I do wonder, though, if there is some benefit to some form of
communal leader, a wrangler as it were, for all groups, or even just
some outside force to resist the tendencies to entropy that can set
in when your intentional community is trying to simply be formed by
intentions.